NCI Logo   DCTD
Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis
Programs:
Biomedical Imaging ProgramCancer Diagnosis ProgramCancer Thereapy Evaluation ProgramDevelopmental Therapeutics ProgramRadiation Research ProgramBiometric Research Branch

  NCI > DCTD > Biometric Research Branch > Selected Publications with Abstract:


SELECTED PUBLICATIONS WITH ABSTRACT


Publication:

Rubinstein, L.V., Shoemaker, R.H., Paull, K.D., Simon, R.M., Tosini, S., Skehan, P., Scudiero, D.A., Monks, A., and Boyd, M.R.: Comparison of in vitro anticancer drug screening data generated with a tetrazolium assay versus a protein assay against a diverse panel of human tumor cell lines. J. Nat. Cancer Inst. 82: 1113-1118, 1990.

Abstract:

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) is implementing a large-scale in vitro drug-screening program that requires a very efficient automated assay of drug effects on tumor cell viability or growth. Many laboratories worldwide have adopted a microculture assay based on metabolic reduction of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). However, because of certain technical advantages to use of the protein-binding dye sulforhodamine B (SRB) in a large-scale screening application, a detailed comparison of data generated by each type of assay was undertaken. The MTT and SRB assays were each used to test 197 compounds, on simultaneous days, against up to 38 human tumor cell lines representing seven major tumor categories. On subsequent days, 38 compounds were retested with the SRB assay and 25 compounds were retested with the MTT assay. For each of these three comparisons, we tabulated the differences between the two assays in the ratios of test group values to control values (T/C) for cell survival; calculated correlation coefficients for various T/C ratios; and estimated the bivariate distribution of the values for IC50 (concentration of drug resulting in T/C values of 50%, or 50% growth inhibition) for the two assays. The results indicate that under the experimental conditions used and within the limits of the data analyses, the assays perform similarly. Because the SRB assay has practical advantages for large-scale screening, however, it has been adopted for routine use in the NCI in vitro antitumor screen.


Publication:

Hodes, L., Paull, K., Koutsoukos, A., Rubinstein, L.: Measures of selectivity and similarity for drug responses in a panel of human tumor cell lines. J. Biopharm. Statist. 2: 31-48, 1992.

Abstract:

Information theory is used to provide a measure of selectivity, i.e., the degree to which a drug has preferential toxicity or growth inhibition for one or a few cell lines from a large panel. The selectivity measure is intended to complement a measure of differential growth inhibition in evaluating the drug development potential of a new compound. Also, a similarity measure obtained from information theory is used to classify drugs according to their pattern of responses on the panel. Some structure-activity relations emerge. This work is applied to 176 agents selected to be tested by the National Cancer Institute in about 50 cell lines.


Publication:

Weinstein, J.N., Kohn, K.W., Grever, M.R., Viswanadhan, V.N., Rubinstein, L.V., Monks, A., Scudiero, D.A., Welch L., Koutsoukos, A., Paull, K.D.: Neural computing in cancer drug development: Predicting mechanism of action, Science 258: 447-451, 1992.

Abstract:

Described here are neural networks capable of predicting a drug's mechanism of action from its pattern of activity against a panel of 60 malignant cell lines in the National Cancer Institute's drug screening program. Given six possible classes of mechanism, the network misses the correct category for only 12 out of 141 agents (8.5 percent), whereas linear discriminant analysis, a standard statistical technique, misses 20 out of 141 (14.2 percent). The success of the neural net indicates several things. (i) The cell line response patterns are rich in information about mechanism. (ii) Appropriately designed neural networks can make effective use of that information. (iii) Trained networks can be used to classify prospectively the more than 10,000 agents per year tested by the screening program. Related networks, in combination with classical statistical tools, will help in a variety of ways to move new anticancer agents through the pipeline from in vitro studies to clinical application.


Publication:

Koutsoukos, A.D. Rubinstein, L.V., Faraggi, D., Simon, R.M., Kalyandrug, S., Weinstein, J.N., Paull, K.D., Kohn, K.W., Discrimination techniques applied to the NCI in vitro antitumor drug screen: predicting biochemical mechanism of action, Stat. in Med. 13: 719-730, 1994.

Abstract:

The National Cancer Institute currently tests approximately 400 compounds per week against a panel of human tumour cell lines in order to identify potential anti-cancer drugs. We describe several approaches, based on these in vitro data, to the problem of identifying the primary biochemical mechanism of action of a compound. Using linear and non-parametric discriminant procedures and cross-validation, we find that accurate identification of the mechanism of action is achieved for approximately 90 per cent of a diverse collection of 141 known compounds, representing six different mechanistic categories. We demonstrate that two-dimensional graphical displays of the compounds in terms of the initial three principal components (of the original data) result in suggestive visual clustering according to mechanism of action. Finally, we compare the classification accuracy of the statistical discrimination procedures with the accuracy obtained from a neural network approach and, for our example, we find that the results obtained from the various approaches are similar.


Publication:

Korn, E.L., Midthune, D., Chen, T.T., Rubinstein, L.V., Christian, M.C., Simon, R.M.: A comparison of two phase I trial designs, Stat. in Med. 13:1799-1806, 1994.

Abstract:

Phase I cancer chemotherapy trials are designed to determine rapidly the maximum tolerated dose of a new agent for further study. A recently proposed Bayesian method, the continual reassessment method, has been suggested to offer an improvement over the standard design of such trials. We find the previous comparisons did not completely address the relative performance of the designs as they would be used in practice. Our results indicate that with the continual reassessment method, more patients will be treated at very high doses and the trials will take longer to complete. We offer some suggested improvements to both the standard design and the Bayesian method.


Publication:

Weinstein, J.N., Myers, T,, O’Connor, P.M., Friend, S.H., Fornace, A.J., Kohn, K.W., Fojo, A., Bates, S.E., Rubinstein, L.V., Anderson, N.L., Buolamwini, J.K., van Osdol, W.W., Monks, A.P., Scudiero, D.A., Sausville, E.A., Zaharevitz, D.G., Bunow, B., Viswanadhan, V.N., Johnson, G.S., Wittes, R.E., Paull, K., An information-intensive approach to the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Science 275: 343-349, 1997.

Abstract:

Since 1990, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has screened more than 60,000 compounds against a panel of 60 human cancer cell lines. The 50-percent growth-inhibitory concentration (GI50) for any single cell line is simply an index of cytotoxicity or cytostasis, but the patterns of 60 such GI50 values encode unexpectedly rich, detailed information on mechanisms of drug action and drug resistance. Each compound's pattern is like a fingerprint, essentially unique among the many billions of distinguishable possibilities. These activity patterns are being used in conjunction with molecular structural features of the tested agents to explore the NCI's database of more than 460,000 compounds, and they are providing insight into potential target molecules and modulators of activity in the 60 cell lines. For example, the information is being used to search for candidate anticancer drugs that are not dependent on intact p53 suppressor gene function for their activity. It remains to be seen how effective this information-intensive strategy will be at generating new clinically active agents.

  Recent Research of BRB | Feedback | BRB Staff | DCTD Home Page

Last Updated on June 18, 2000
General Information: brb@linus.nci.nih.gov